Prediction of Oliver Bonding [] vs Emile Hudd [537th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W L L W L L
Form
W W L L L L W W W LH2H: Bonding 1 - 0 Hudd
They have played 2 sets in total, with Bonding winning 2 and Hudd winning 0. The last match between Bonding and Hudd was at the M15 Lannion, 22-02-2025, Semifinals, I.hard with Oliver Bonding getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Oliver Bonding | 1 |
| Emile Hudd | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-2 |
Stats 
Oliver Bonding
Player
Emile Hudd
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:25:52 | Average Match Time | 1:25:52 |
| 56% (33/59) | 1st Serve % | 64% (42/66) |
| 79% (26/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (25/42) |
| 62% (16/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (13/24) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 42% (28/66) | Return Points Win % | 29% (17/59) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Oliver Bonding vs Emile Hudd Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bonding 1 - 0 Hudd
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bonding has won 48.29% of points on their second serve, while Hudd has won 41.89%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bonding, in recent form, has won 45.45% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hudd has won 47.09%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.13% and 28.35% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bonding has saved 52.94% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hudd has saved 59.17% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bonding has won 44.44% of matches played (W/L 8/ 10), with Hudd winning 59.02% (W/L 36/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bonding has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 83% (W/L 5/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Hudd has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 75% (W/L 6/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 15/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Bonding has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.06% of matches (W/L 8/ 9), where as Hudd has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.33% of matches (W/L 28/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bonding winning 1 times and Hudd being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Bonding winning 2 and Hudd winning 0. The last match between Bonding and Hudd was at the M15 Lannion, 22-02-2025, Semifinals, I.hard with Oliver Bonding getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:25:52.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bonding and Hudd have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bonding winning 0 times and Hudd 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Bonding winning 1, and Hudd 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bonding has played against opponents with an average rank of 124.28 while Hudd has played against players with an average rank of 189.95.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bonding has won 20% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hudd has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bonding has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hudd has converted 40.18% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Oliver Bonding vs Emile Hudd Best Odds For The Match
Oliver Bonding Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Matisse Bobichon
Player
Oliver Bonding
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Oliver Bonding
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oliver Bonding
Player
Pierre Delage
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
9
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miles Jones
Player
Oliver Bonding
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 1-6 7-6(5) 12-10 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Oliver Bonding
Player
Ian Luca Cervantes Tomas
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Oliver Bonding
Player
Axel Garcian
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
15 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Oliver Bonding
Player
Emile Hudd
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oliver Bonding
Player
Pierre Antoine Faut
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oliver Bonding
Player
Thomas Deschamps
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Emile Hudd Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Oliver Bonding
Player
Emile Hudd
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Boris Butulija
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(3) 2-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Louis Larue
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
7
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Leo Raquillet
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
4 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
40
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Tammaro
Player
Emile Hudd
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
4
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
0
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Emile Hudd
70%
(
69 of
99)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
101)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
46 of
68)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
100
Total Points Won
100
|
1-6 7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seungmin Park
Player
Emile Hudd
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luca Castelnuovo
Player
Emile Hudd
100%
(
84 of
84)
1st Serve %
100%
(
79 of
79)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
48 of
79)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Maximus Jones
77%
(
79 of
103)
1st Serve %
52%
(
56 of
108)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
109
Total Points Won
102
|
6-7(3) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Bonding vs Hudd?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Bonding Vs Hudd is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 44% (8/10) | Win/Loss | 61% (91/58) |
| 49% (20/21) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (201/135) |
| 48% (200/219) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (1753/1506) |
| 0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.41 |
| 68 | Aces Total | 652 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 34 | Total Double Faults | 294 |
| 1:42:33 | Average Match Time | 1:26:57 |
| 124.28 | Average Opponent Rank | 137.23 |
| 59% (686/1164) | 1st Serve % | 64% (5274/8215) |
| 65% (444/686) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (3730/5274) |
| 52% (248/478) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1454/2942) |
| 44% (39/89) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (343/791) |
| 37% (427/1147) | Return Points Win % | 39% (3263/8331) |
| 44% (8/18) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (90/147) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 64% (7/11) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (22/49) |
| 20% (1/5) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (21/41) |
| 70% (10/7) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (89/83) |
| 30% (10/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (89/6) |
| 13% (8/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (60/9) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
